Photoshop art, and boy did this one take me a good while to do. Inspiration came from =AttempteStock's Contest, for which I've decided this is my entry.
Credits:
Background: this is my backyard, believe it or not. If you like it and would like to use it, note me. (I am debating on whether or not to start a stock account. I'll keep you posted.)
Girl in green: =AttempteStock
Girl in pink: *Nekoha-stock
Girl in burgundy: *FantasyStock
Little girl: ~LIZZY12
Angel wings: ~shadavar-stock
If you read the details of the contest, you may have a better idea where this sprang from, but basically all I could think of with this one is that the girl on the left (in green) is dreaming of her fragile youth, which appears to be slowly flying away. The contest is titled "Fragile Things," and what's more fragile than our very own childhood; our innocence? It's kind of a melancholy piece I suppose.
I really like how this one developed from what I had in my head to what I put on the screen. This is not at all how I pictured it, but I really like this result better. The fact that I couldn't find a good background stock which suited my purpose kind of re-set the entire piece, and I honestly didn't think I'd be able to take a good enough shot to use, but I guess we all surprise ourselves sometimes. Hopefully, this will be the first of many ventures into the (freezing) snow to take some nice wintery shots. The snow wasn't originally planned, either, but I can't control the weather around here. And the snow makes my backyard a lot prettier than it really is.
I would really like any and all comments you have, good or bad.
Great concept. I like the way you've portrayed the theme. You did do a lot of good montage work, nice cuts and some pretty good blending.
Just a few recommendations:
1. Watch your focus when blending images. This is mostly in regards to how you've placed =Attempte in the bushes. Notice how the bush in front and behind her have a sharp, clear focus, but she seems softer? The contrast draws the eye and makes it obvious that she was placed there. It throws off the visions depth of field. As a suggestion, maybe you could adjust the bush behind her to have the same softness to give the impression of depth and help her blend in.
The same sort of goes for the wings on the angels. Not necessarily a depth issue, just that the wings are more pronounced/sharp than the actual girls. They seem to have more substance than the girls themselves. I know that's hard since the wings are white and so is a good deal of the enviroment. I'd have to say the best set are on the girl in Burgundy.
2. The colors overall seem so muted, washed out. I'm sure this is due to the snow and the effects you had to place in the forground. I just can't help but feel that there's something missing. Like there's no real tone variation. Again, hard due to the winter scene. The dresses have good color, but when you adjust the opacity, it's lost. I would recommend applying a color effect to the dresses to help enhance their color (pre-transparency) then lowering the fill and a little of the opacity. Fill will lower the transparency of the layer while leaving effects relatively untouched, while opacity affects the transparency of everything on the layer. So for example, if you were to apply a drop shadow and then lower the fill, the object that has the shadow would go translucent, but the shadow would remain stong. By doing this, you can retain some of the color but still get the transparent effect.
Just my 2 cents Naturally, if anything I've recommended goes against a certain style you're trying to achieve, then disregard what I said. Don't let anyone tell you that your style is a flaw that needs to be fixed.
i love that story...
lovely picture!
Thanks for the comment.
Just a few recommendations:
1. Watch your focus when blending images. This is mostly in regards to how you've placed =Attempte in the bushes. Notice how the bush in front and behind her have a sharp, clear focus, but she seems softer? The contrast draws the eye and makes it obvious that she was placed there. It throws off the visions depth of field. As a suggestion, maybe you could adjust the bush behind her to have the same softness to give the impression of depth and help her blend in.
The same sort of goes for the wings on the angels. Not necessarily a depth issue, just that the wings are more pronounced/sharp than the actual girls. They seem to have more substance than the girls themselves. I know that's hard since the wings are white and so is a good deal of the enviroment. I'd have to say the best set are on the girl in Burgundy.
2. The colors overall seem so muted, washed out. I'm sure this is due to the snow and the effects you had to place in the forground. I just can't help but feel that there's something missing. Like there's no real tone variation. Again, hard due to the winter scene. The dresses have good color, but when you adjust the opacity, it's lost. I would recommend applying a color effect to the dresses to help enhance their color (pre-transparency) then lowering the fill and a little of the opacity. Fill will lower the transparency of the layer while leaving effects relatively untouched, while opacity affects the transparency of everything on the layer. So for example, if you were to apply a drop shadow and then lower the fill, the object that has the shadow would go translucent, but the shadow would remain stong. By doing this, you can retain some of the color but still get the transparent effect.
Just my 2 cents